In todayās spotĀ weāre playing 4-handed. We have AJ in the big blind. Thereās a steal from the button, call from the small blind, and the Hero decides to 3bet.
Alastair in the write-up says this: āI wanted to send this hand because Iām working on expanding my 3bet range and quickly realizing that you do get into tricky spots, especially with a deep SPR such as this.ā
And in this spot, the button is 29/24/3 over 18 hands, which Alastair admits is not a ton, but enough to probably suggest theyāre opening wide for the button and you can probably squeeze AJs for value.
So first and foremost, I love the fact that weāre squeezing here. Yes, 18 hands is not a ton. Yes, this dude is probably stealing, and, yeah, Iām totally cool squeezing AJ.
Now, as for the size, which is going to be really, really important. I would much prefer to go something closer to 4X here and just take this up to, like, 250 and go from there.
I donāt really want to go only 3X here. This size gives the button a great price, plus position, so he probably calls and the small blind comes along as well and now all of a sudden, itās a bloated, 3-way pot.
And it just doesnāt really do anything because I probably wouldnāt squeeze this for $1.80 for value. Iād probably go larger for value, so I also need to keep my bluffs in that same range. In fact, I think 4X is going to be a much better multiplier here. So definitely in the future, go larger. As played, get called, get called, and go 3-way to the flop.
So in this situation, the small blind checks. Hero decides to continuation bet for $3.10. And we really have to decide if we like to see that, yes or no? In this situation, a middle-ish, connected board is one that I typically donāt do a lot of c-betting on multi-way pots, just because these are the kind of boards where players are going to hit a very, very non zero percent of the time. We have a hand like AJ, so we block out combos of over-hand cards like KJ, JT, all those kind of things. Well, JT doesnāt go anywhere in this board, but you get the point.
So itās one of those where youāre not getting a lot of folds here in my opinion. Youāre certainly not getting two players to fold a very, very large chunk of the time. So you already have to be looking towards double and triple barrels. And against the small blind, you donāt have enough flexibility for that. And, yes, we do have backdoor flush, backdoor straight, over cards. We have all those kind of potentials, but I donāt think we have a lot of fold equity here or later. Because of that, I donāt particularly love this c-bet and Iād much rather just check here and kind of see what the button does, maybe get a free card and go forward from there.
I think just firing out here is not going to be a very fruitful play, and chances are, you donāt have a lot of plans for turns. And especially if thereās any chance the small blind could continue, and I think thereās a very decent chance of that. Not super in love with this bet.
But weāre going to get a call with the button, small blind goes away, go to the turn, improve, and Hero decides to go for a check and then check-call of $6.10.
So hereās the thing. If you donāt continuation bet the flop, you donāt really ever get to the turn the way this hand is played out so far. Keep that in mind. But one thing I want to say is this just looking at the rest of the hand. Hero decided to go check-call on the turn, river decides to check-fold. Keep that in mind as we talk about this.
When you just check-call on the turn, what do you represent? You represent probably a single pair or a draw that doesnāt really know what else to do or decides that check-calling is best. Maybe youāre checking to induce more bluffs. It is what it is. You decide to check-call.
But if thatās the case, when the river completely breaks out, you kind of have to continue with that call. Otherwise, what are you ever continuing with? In a situation like this, this is something that you may want to consider, but if you took the line on the turn to check and induce bluffs, you have to assume thereās going to be at least some bluffs on the river.
Maybe he turns something like 87 into a bluff or 56 into a bluff or busted diamonds into a bluff. Or maybe heās betting a nineĀ thinking that itās for value and that youāre somehow going to call with ā I donāt know ā AK or 66ās or something like that.
But either way, you canāt be certain enough that youāre smoked here. And if youāre going to take the check-call on the turn, you have to take the check-call on the river. It really doesnāt make much sense to play it this way and then fold here. It just isnāt something that you want to be doing.
But, again, the major thing is in the hand, squeeze, awesome. Just make sure to size a better preflop. On the flop, if youāre going to continuation bet, you need to have plans on turns and rivers, especially when you actually improve on those cards. And I donāt really love this line as played because in the write-up, Alastair did mention trying to induce bluffs on the turn. And if thatās the case, then follow it up, induce that bluff on the river, and make sure to call it and expect to win the pot a very non-zero percentage of the time.
Over the years, podcasts have become a hit, and you can find plenty of them…
Most poker advice fails before you even sit down. Not because the tips are wrong.…
When I first entered poker back in 2004, the landscape was quite different than it…