Preflop poker can be tricky. Make mistakes, take the wrong lines, or implement the wrong strategy and you set yourself up for a very -EV hand. This quiz challenges your preflop ability by taking you through 15 different hands to see what your exact play would be. After you take the quiz, continue watching the video (or reading) and see how your line compares to the average poker playerās and also my own play. There is no better way to test your playbook and see how you stack up!
Letās get into it!
Assumptions: In each hand assume you are dealt into a brand-new table. You have zero information on the other playerās strengths, weaknesses, or leaks. You only see their stack sizes and positions.
The first hand is from $2/$5 live. Raise to $25 from EP2. Two calls in middle position. What are you doing? So 70% of people said theyād call, 23% said fold, and 7% said that they would 3bet to $150. And just for the record, those are the preset sizes. I didnāt give options to choose size in the quiz.
Now in this situation, calling is a pure default for me here. I would definitely be calling this at a bare minimum. Iām actually really shocked that so many people, almost a quarter of people said that they would fold in this situation. And that feels really weird to me and very nitty. I donāt really see any reason why you would. I mean, you have two players that are both deep with you, and, yes, EP2, yes, they only start with 100 big blinds, yes, theyāre opening from an early position, but that should be a pretty strong range of hands. There should definitely be some implied odds opportunities against that, not even mentioning MP1 and MP2 as well. Itās a live game, right? People tend to not be as good. There tends to be a lot of implied odds in that environment, and as such, definitely going to be calling here and going for the set mine.
Next one, we have KT suited. Weāre playing $2/$5 again. Thereās a limp from EP1, two limps in middle position, and itās to you on the button. So 55% of people said that they would raise to $40, and 19% said they would raise to $15, 22% said they would limp behind, and a couple of people said fold. I donāt understand why the heck you would ever fold in this situation. I know I certainly wouldnāt. My main options are between limping behind or raising to $40.
I donāt think raising to $15 makes a tremendous amount of sense. If you raised only three big blinds here, chances are youāre getting a lot of callers. Yeah, your hand is just not going to perform that great in that scenario. If Iām going to raise, Iām definitely going to look to apply pressure. Maybe itās $40 that I choose, maybe itās $50 that I choose. Iām definitely going on the larger side of the spectrum. I donāt want to give people a great price to limp/call with 67 suited, A3 offsuit, any of that kind of stuff. I want to apply pressure, see if I can get them to fold, and picking up 22 uncontested preflop, definitely not mad at that.
At a bare minimum, limping behind or raising to $40 is probably more what Iām probably going to do, again, $40 to $50, something in that ballpark.
Moving onwards, in this situation, we have AT. Thereās a raise to 4x from EP2, MP1 calls, and here we are. Again, this kind of mimics live play really, really well, a lot of multiway opportunities and what are you going to do in them?
In this situation, almost 60% of people said that they would fold. In my opinion, if youāre really not confident postflop, okay, maybe you can justify that. But I think in this scenario, you could definitely be 3betting with blockers here looking for a squeeze. You may say, āWait, weāre talking about an unknown game, you donāt have information, so your default is really going to be to squeeze?ā I would say, yeah, I want to start applying pressure. I want to start my image nice and going. And I also think Iām going to pick this pot up uncontested a pretty large chunk of the time.
Remember, if I donāt know anything on them, chances are that they donāt know anything on me. As such, I think I can fight for this pot and pick it up a pretty large chunk of the time uncontested. So 3betting to $80 will definitely get the job done. Maybe itās $80, maybe itās $100, but something in that ballpark I think definitely generates a fair chunk of folds. I donāt think anyone behind me is going to want to cold call that. So I think that these kind of players are going to melt away a large chunk of the time.
Are people going to feel that comfortable with KQ, with AJ, with 88? I donāt think a lot of people are. And obviously there are lots of other hands that people could have in their ranges, both EP2 and MP1. As such, I want to start applying that pressure, picking up this pot uncontested, setting up my table image for the session. Rather than just constantly folding or calling and hoping that I hit a flop, why not squeeze and try to apply that pressure myself?
In this next spot, we have T8 suited. We are in the big blind. Weāre playing $1/$2 this time. Cut-off raises, button calls, small blind calls, and here we are.
So 57% of people said that they would call, but Iām also kind of shocked that 31% of people said that they would fold in this scenario. So, again, this is another spot where Iām probably never going to be folding myself. Maybe if weāre all really shallow, sure, definitely donāt want to be playing these implied odds kind of hands in really, really shallow pots. But I donāt see this being a situation where we have to fold by any stretch. I think 3betting could be valid. I think calling is definitely valid. If Iām being totally honest, it kind of takes a crowbar and a stick of dynamite to get me away from a suited connector or a suited gap or anything that has a lot of playability and equity potential. I just see folding this being far too tight.
You also kind of notice this common thread. Just through the hand before you looked at it, you notice it going further, is that a lot of players as a pure default are playing on the nittier side of the spectrum. Maybe thatās because I set the stage as this is a default game, we donāt have any other info. But if youāre playing really, really tight in a game where you have no info and passing up on spots that can easily be plus EV by taking another line, Iād say thatās definitely something that you want to be looking within your game. A lot of people do this. I mean, this is a pretty good sample size, 5.6K poker players have taken this quiz and this is their kind of results and general answers.
I think if youāre following the mindset of just constantly folding and getting out of spots and playing really passively, Iād say youāre probably doing yourself a disservice to say the least. Read this article and find out why folding too often is a really bad ideaā¦
Next spot we have A3 suited. Thereās a limp from EP3, MP2 decides to iso, and itās to you. So in this situation, a lot of people said that they would fold, almost 2/3. Then the other answers are split pretty evenly between 3betting and just calling. In this situation, I think folding is going to be fine as a default. I think you should definitely look to squeeze. I think calling is not going to be the greatest thing. Youāre not super, super deep. Also, if you call, chances are at least EP3 calls and now all of a sudden, youāre trying to play a suited ace out of position in a multi-way pot. Thatās not going to be the easiest spot in the world and I donāt think itās going to be the most profitable either. So, as such, I think folding here is totally fine. I donāt think you need to get out of line here.
Remember, you may look at this and say, āWhat the heck, Split? Like, two seconds ago, you said I should not be folding so often.ā Remember, just because you shouldnāt fold, everything doesnāt mean that there arenāt situations definitely to fold, especially when you are out of position. When youāre going to be creating multi-way or not-so-great opportunities for yourself, you have to be aware of this situation as a whole. Itās not a black and white answer of just never fold. Itās, okay, what is this scenario Iām getting myself into and is this going to be profitable for my hand, for my skillset, for the math, for everything else that goes into the equation?
Next we have QQ, so playing $1/$2, thereās a raise to $10, thereās a raise to call, and here we are. You notice that the average person, 92%, very large chunk, said that they would just 3bet this to $50, a couple of people said that they would call, and a couple of people said that they would fold. Obviously only 20% said that they would fold.
Just for the record, if you create poker quizzes or youāre thinking about creating quizzes ever, itās always good to create kind of a trap door answer in at least one question. Essentially, what I mean by that is only trolls would answer this question with fold. So if I was being really diligent with the results, I would go back and say, āOkay, everyone who said fold, delete all of their answers.ā That way you can get rid of people that are trolling answers or trolling your own quizzes. Just a side note for quiz makers out there.
So in this scenario, obviously the average person says 3bet. I would also be 3betting this as a pure default and just playing poker from there. Obviously youāre going to be a little leery if EP1 decides to 4bet, but I donāt think thatās happening a large chunk of the time. I think, more often, youāre getting flats, and, of course, I think youāre going to have a very, very good equity edge and also skill edge going forward.
Next we have AJ, again, at $1/$2. Thereās a raise, thereās a call, what are we doing here? So in this situation, a lot of people said that they would squeeze, some people said call, and then some people said fold.
Again, the folding part of the spectrum, I donāt really understand why you would be folding here. I think thereās definitely enough reason to get involved. If youāre going to get involved, I really like the squeeze in this scenario. This is kind of similar to the AT, right? We have position. We have a hand that does just fine. Iām really shocked to see that so many people would 3bet AJ here, but with AT off suit, very few people wanted to squeeze, which is a little bit weird. But thatās really good information because what we can glean from this that the average player pool, for whatever reason, views AJ as infinitely stronger than AT. Is that truly the case when youāre squeezing because think about the range that your opponents would give you action with? Is AJ really doing better than AT? Well, not by a large multiplier, thatās for sure.
In this situation, yes, Iām definitely going to be squeezing. If Iām looking to squeeze AT, Iām definitely going to be looking to squeeze AJ in a very similar scenario, so definitely on board with that.
Next one we have QQ. Again in this scenario playing $1/$2. Limp, limp, limp and weāre in the small. Again, we have the trapdoor troll answer with 12 people saying that they would fold in this scenario. Thatās pretty goofy. But most people are split obviously between raising to $22 and raising to $10. So people obviously understand the raise part of it, but Iād say they donāt necessarily understand the size part of it. And this is just a scenario where, yes, go with the larger bet size side of the spectrum. If Iām only giving you the two options between $10 here and $22 here, you should definitely be going the larger side of the spectrum. Raising just to $10, pretty much guarantees youāre going 4 if not 5-way to the flop, and itās going to be pretty tricky to play that spot out versus going to $22.
I donāt think youāre going to go 4 or 5-way to it a large chunk of the time. Youāll probably go heads-up, maybe 3-way, and youāre going to have a bigger pot, youāre going to have a simpler SPR, and, of course, you can go for pure value from there.
So, again, think about this situation. Think about the spot that youāre creating and your edges, and what spot youāre creating and how itās going to work out for you. Again, I think just going to $10 here would be a big, big no-no, and it would leave a lot of money on the table.
In this next spot, we have everyoneās favorite hand, AK. Weāre playing $2/$5. There is a raise from EP3 and here we are. Again, trapdoor answer, found 26 trolls that said they wanted to fold. Obviously not going to be folding here. Itās between 3bet and calling. Iām actually really shocked that almost a quarter of people said that they wanted to call in this situation. Although, kind of not shocking though because a lot of the average answers tend to be on the nittier side of the spectrum. Again, I donāt really want you to fall into that trap.
Iād much rather see you play aggressive, fight for pots preflop and stop just always taking the passive or the nittier option. Again, the nittier option is oftentimes in this quiz between folding and/or calling. This is obviously a no-fold scenario. Itās just one of those where I donāt want to see you call with Ace King. What is calling accomplishing? Again, this is one of those spots where as a pure default, 3bet with Ace King. With information, there could be different spots where I could see calling here being much, much better, with certain information on EP3, with certain information on the players behind you. But as a pure default, you should definitely be 3betting and going from there.
Next situation, we have AA, playing $1/$2, thereās a limp, thereās an iso to $12, and weāre in the small. Again, the average person wants to 3bet, totally on board of that. Thereās no reason at all to flat in this scenario. Again, Iām really shocked that so many people thought flatting was going to be the right idea. I mean, flatting, yes, will get EP3 involved a pretty large chunk of the time. Iām not saying flatting is awful, but as a pure default, Iām just going to 3bet and go from there. You donāt need to 3bet huge or anything. This isnāt a spot where you need to 3bet to $60. But I think if your 3bets are something like $35, I think cut off is going to be giving action a pretty large chunk of the time, and postflop is going to be pretty darn simple and value injected.
If you had information, yes, it could bend me towards flatting more often. But I think as a pure default going to a normal 3bet size is going to be just fine.
Next situation, we have QJ offsuit. Thereās a limp from EP1. Thereās an iso from MP1, a call by MP2. So roughly 2/3 of people said that they wanted to fold here, the rest wanted to call, and then a very, very small chunk wanted to 3bet. And in this situation, I donāt really want to be calling. I think QJ off is going to perform pretty meh, and chances are youāre going to be going 5 or 6-way to it. Youāre not going to have the deepest SPR when it comes to maneuverability postflop. 3betting, Iām not super, super stoked about this spot. I just donāt think that this is going to be a great one, so because of that, as a pure default, Iām going to fold here, too. Remember, folding canāt be the right option, but if youāre always, always taking the nitty option, again, thatās where youāre probably strategically going to be a little bit on the wrong side of the spectrum.
Alright, coming into the homestretch, we have 44, playing $1/$2. Thereās a raise and a bunch of callers. What are we doing here? 84% of people said that they would call in this scenario. Very few said 3bet. Some people said fold. Again, not really sure why people are wanting to fold these set mine scenarios, but this is one where Iām definitely set mining as a pure default, just kind of play poker and go forward from there. I donāt see any reason to fold, and as a pure default, I wouldnāt squeeze this either. I think itās going to be too hard to get it through, and itās just a situation where I think flatting is going to be more profitable. So setmine and play poker from there.
Next spot, we have T9 suited, playing $2/$5. Thereās a raise, what are you doing, and the cutoff. A lot of people said that they would call, and then the other answers are not quite evenly split, but folding and 3betting. As a pure default, Iām going to call this as well. I mean, weāre 150 big blinds deep against EP2. We have position. We have a hand that does just fine. And with no information, I canāt assume that thereās aggressive squeezers or anything behind me, plus itās live.
I donāt think thereās a lot of aggressive squeezers anyway unless thatās kind of known information. As such, Iām going to figure by flatting, Iāll probably pick up the button a pretty large chunk of the time and we just go forward from there. Again, stack depth position, hand playability, all things that Iām looking for, since I donāt have any other information on EP2, the players behind me, any of that sort of stuff.
Next situation, we have JT suited, playing $1/$2. Folds to us in early middle, what are we doing? So 2/3 of people said that they would open raise here. Iām going to say at least half of those people are lying. I donāt mean that disrespectfully or anything, but I think theyāre fooling themselves saying that as a default, theyāre going to be opening JT suited from here. The main reason why I say this is because the average answer for this quiz so far has been on the nittier side of the spectrum. It is not a nitty thing to open JT suited from early middle. So as such, I think the average person is kind of bluffing themselves in this scenario. I think the average person is probably folding this more often than not. I do agree, I think some people are definitely limping it, and as a pure, pure default, I donāt really want to start a limping thing from early position.
Thatās more when I have information on the table. I know how thatās going to work out. I donāt think Iām going to start that. And open raising, yeah, I mean, itās just not a super-deep table or anything. Itās going to be very difficult to get position, probably going to be creating a pot thatās not great for you, and as such, probably just folding as a pure default. Again, I hate giving the nitty answer, but as a pure, pure default with no information, yeah, I donāt really see any reason to raise this from early middle, just give it what we have.
Finally, we have final JT suited, last question of the quiz, playing $1/$2. Thereās one limper from EP3, what are we doing here from the high jack. You notice that the answer is obviously largely to raise. A couple of people said that they would limp behind. Very few people said fold. The main thing is the size. Again, I gave two different options. I gave a 4x size and an 8x size. Iām actually really shocked that the 4x size is dominating by so much. This is a scenario where I much prefer to go to $16. The main reason is is because if you go to 8, I think youāre going multi-way to the flop a much larger chunk of the time. They see you raise, youāve got two people that could contend position on you.
I think chances are thatās going to create a multi-way pot if you just to $8 here. Whereas if you raise to $16, you apply more pressure, you probably get rid of some hands that obviously youāre happy to get rid of, and you probably get a heads up or a no way pot more often. If it goes no way and I pick up five uncontested preflop, Iām not mad at that. If I end up getting called by EP3, I have position, I have skill edge, I have initiative, I have all these good things in my favor, then Iām much more on board with that. So Iām definitely going to be raising, but I would inverse my answer. I would raise to $16, definitely will not be raising to $8 as a default in this scenario.
Thatās going to wrap it up for this video. I really hope you enjoyed it and I know this is a very different kind of video for this channel, but Iām hoping this is kind of the illuminating, looking at how the average person who took this quiz is answering these questions, how the average person in a player pool is probably thinking about these spots. If you really think about that, you can start to say, āWait, wait, wait. So this is not like the average non-fish in my game,ā because the average person who is taking this is not an ultra-fish. Theyāre just probably on the nittier tag side of the spectrum. So if you can understand how that person thinks about these kinds of default scenarios, that can massively help you take counter lines and figure out figure out what you want to do against them.
Hopefully this helps thinking about not only the average person, but also how my answers can sometimes quite massively differ from those, and how you can use that to your advantage. Again, thinking about these spots very logically, thinking about things conceptually, thinking about them in terms of edge and where your edges lie, and how you can craft plus EV lines around that.
Over the years, podcasts have become a hit, and you can find plenty of them…
Most poker advice fails before you even sit down. Not because the tips are wrong.…
When I first entered poker back in 2004, the landscape was quite different than it…