Finding weaknesses in our thought process is a critical part of improving as a player. A common weakness that many players have when it comes to betting decisions is cognitive dissonance in poker. The dictionary more or less defines cognitive dissonance as âinconsistent thoughts relating to a decision.â Thereâs one decision in particular that we have in mind here, and itâs something you should look out for.
Suppose youâre on the river in a heads-up situation, and youâre trying to decide if you should pull off a bluff. You may think to yourself that your opponent is calling a bet there entirely too often for a bluff to make sense, so you check behind accordingly. The key thought here that drives the decision-making process is that the opponent is calling a bet pretty often.
However, you might have been put in the exact same situation with different hole cards so that you were deciding if you should value bet or not. Something that happens to a lot of players is that, in the exact same spot as above, theyâll convince themselves that their opponent isnât calling that much at all, so they probably canât value bet profitably with whatever hand they have at the time.
This is cognitive dissonance because your thoughts about how your opponent is going to play completely changed. You were essentially thinking two different things at the same time when they were convenient. So why does this happen?
Letâs be clear about something: There are some situations in poker where you shouldnât bluff but still canât value bet with a wide range. Situations where your opponent has a really strong range are good examples of this. However, thatâs not what weâre really focused on here.
Instead, we want to focus on the two sets of competing thoughts that led to the decision to avoid both bluffing and value betting. These thoughts were completely different because in one case the justification was that our opponent would be folding a lot, and in the other case it was that the opponent wouldnât be folding much at all.
Both of these canât be true at the same time! Whatâs happening is that the player is running into some major pessimism because of a lack of clarity on the situation. So how do we fix this?
One of the quickest and easiest ways to correct this lack of clarity and avoid a lot of situations of cognitive dissonance in poker is to make decisions about our opponentâs likely range and play without thinking so much about the specific cards we hold (except for card removal purposes).
If youâre able to detach from the perceived value of your hand for a moment, then you can avoid tricking yourself into thinking that two different things are true at the same time. Detaching from the value of your hand before making your assessments of your opponentâs play and ranges will help you to be much more objective because your view wonât be skewed by the cards you hold.
Â
Poker contains a lot of repetitive math, especially when studying poker hands away from the…
Live cash game poker is a totally different beast compared to playing online. Between the…
If you're new to live poker, it might seem a little daunting at first. Whether…