This hand is from a $2/$3 live game. Thereās an open limp, thereās a small raise and hero decides to 3bet to $27. This is the kind of situation where I would much prefer hero 3bet significantly larger. Iām definitely happy that weāre 3betting, I definitely want to be doing that, but when you only go to $27 here, youāre letting your opponent get a pretty great price and youāre giving them bothĀ position. Both of those things are usually things I donāt want to do together. Particularly when thereās a lot of play left and when I can easily charge him more preflop. Now thereās no information given about villain or the other villain for that matter but typically this is the spot where Iām just going to go up to something like $45 or $50 bucks and play forward from there.
Yes that may seem egregiously large considering he only went to 3X but he went to 3X in a situation where he should have gone larger himself and 2, I donāt play into this game. They go small because when a 3 bet comes in, it typically comes in smaller as well which then gives them more ability to get involved with it. I want to say, āno, no, no. If you want to get involved with me thatās fine but youāre going to pay a premium to do soā. This is a situation where again Iād much prefer to see the larger size happen for pure, pure value and weāll just go forward from there. But as played we only go to $27, get a caller, get another caller and the flopĀ gives us two overs and aĀ flush draw ā but itās extremely, extremely connected and hero decides to continuation bet for $25 bucks.
In this situation Iād say you have two different options. You could 1, continuation bet for somebody like $70 or $75 bucks and then rip turns when itās about a pot size or left on the turn or 2, you could try to go for a check-raise here. I donāt think betting $25 is going to be a good option because if you get called youāre going to be at awkward land a lot on the turn. If you get raised, okay youāre in a situation where you pretty much have to commit but your $25 bet didnāt really do anything. It just again, creates this kind of an awkward situation. Again this is another spot in the hand where bet sizing seems to be an issue.
David I would definitely say maybe spend a little time thinking about your bet sizing strategy because yes I know youāre curious about how to handle the rest of this hand but honestly bet sizing is a huge, huge factor when it comes to playing anything. Especially live games. If youāre making inaccuracies in bet sizing, trust me itās going to hurt so as played we end up getting called, end up facing a raise and here we are. Davidās real question at this point is, ādo we just call this? Do we shove it? What goes into this?ā. Itās a pretty fair question. Itās a little bit uncomfortable because is there really any fold equity, yes or no. Itās a little awkward.
What I want to do is take a moment and show you how to proof this mathematically. Now this is all stuff you do away from the table and when you do enough of these calculations off table, you start to get a general feel for it when youāre in real time. In this situation Iām just going to use my custom spread sheet. You can download this. If your interested, hereās a link for grab this poker spreadsheet. We already pre populated most of the important information. Pot size before we shove is 258. How much more when we shove is 268, awesome. We have to call $100 more. The only 2 things left are, whatās our equity uncalled and does villain ever fold, yes or no.
Letās proof our equity first. Here we have ace king of hearts, we have the board and now we have to assign the range. This is the range of hands that our opponent would have would raise the flop to $125 and would call our shove with. I think itās reasonable to say sets are in that range. Letās say they could have they could have the nuts, I think thatās totally reasonable. Letās say top air, top kicker totally reasonable. Letās say the combo draws. Like jack 10 and 10/9. Letās also maybe do like a king 10, just a king 10 suited and maybe an ace 10 suited too, sure. That factors in some of those like over card and 2 way straight draw kind of things. Maybe weāll throw in a couple of suited connectors just for the heck of it. Suit selection, throw hearts on those, good to go and evaluate.
You notice that we have 44% equity, awesome. You notice that as played assuming that thereās even no fold equity whatsoever, this is still fine. If he ever folds, letās say he raises something like king 10 and then if you shove, he randomly decides to hit the full button. Well if thatās the case, your equity goes down a little bit but then all of a sudden thereās hands and villains ranges then foldings. Then all of a sudden youāre getting that extra fold equity bonus which is fantastic. This is just a situation where, yeah Iām just going to shove here. Certainly not going to fold my grip of equity. I am not going to call him and try to like shove turns. I donāt see that doing anything good. Iām not going to call him and fold to a turn rip because I donāt want to do that.
Itās just the kind of situation where I donāt really have any option that Iām like thrilled with other than shoving. Shove it is and just ride the variance train and go from there. In this situation we end running into exactly the nuts and you know what, it just is what it is. This is all factored into the equity, the EV. It just simply is what it is. We donāt panic about it. We just ride the variance train. Weāll win this our fair share. Other times weāll lose but you know what it just is what it is. Weāre not going to panic about it. This is not a situation to freak out about I assure you.
Over the years, podcasts have become a hit, and you can find plenty of them…
Most poker advice fails before you even sit down. Not because the tips are wrong.…
When I first entered poker back in 2004, the landscape was quite different than it…